As mortgage brokers, we are specifically focusing on the confronting property and housing-related aspects of the 2026 Federal Budget, as we are genuinely concerned about the potential long-term impact these proposed changes may have on younger Australians, middle-aged families, renters and everyday Australians trying to build financial stability through property ownership.
Many Australians are still reeling from the proposed housing tax changes in Australia 2026, including the negative gearing and property tax changes announced as part of the 2026 Federal Budget.
Not only because of the possible impact on investors, renters and the broader Australian housing market — but also because many people feel frustrated seeing major policy positions change after earlier assurances they would not.
As mortgage brokers working directly with everyday Australians every day, we wanted to share our team’s perspective on what we are actually seeing on the ground.
This is simply our broker team’s opinion based on real lending conversations and scenarios. All trying to navigate one of the toughest housing markets Australia has seen in decades.
Will These Changes Actually Help Young Australians?
The Government says the proposed changes are designed to improve affordability and help younger Australians buy homes.
But from our perspective, many Australians are questioning whether these changes will realistically create the dramatic improvements people are hoping for. Realistically, most people are not expecting:
- A $900,000 property to suddenly become a $600,000 property
- Rental prices to suddenly collapse
- Housing shortages to disappear overnight
Australia’s housing affordability challenges are driven by much larger structural issues, including:
- Housing undersupply
- Strong population growth
- Rising construction costs
- Infrastructure delays
- Council approval bottlenecks
- Limited housing close to jobs, schools and family networks
These are problems that have built up over many years and cannot easily be solved through investor tax changes alone.
Could these Tax Changes Hurt Young Australians?
Many younger buyers simply cannot afford to purchase a family home as their first property close to:
- Their work
- Their family
- Their support network
- Their community
Many younger Australians have relied on negative gearing and long-term property growth as part of stepping-stone property strategies to enter the market, including:
- Purchasing a modest investment property first
- Renting it out while living with family or closer to work
- Buying in more affordable areas first
- Slowly upgrading over time as incomes and family circumstances improve
For many younger Australians, this is not about becoming wealthy property investors.
It is simply about getting their foot in the door.
Negative gearing benefits and capital gains tax incentives have historically helped support these stepping-stone strategies by assisting borrowing capacity, cashflow and long-term equity growth.
From our perspective, reducing or removing these incentives may effectively tax and penalise younger Australians who are simply trying to use a modest first property purchase as a pathway to building equity. Upgrading, as and when they can. However they will need to CGT Reductions as well and affordability being assisted with Negative Gearing
Negative Gearing Also Impacts Borrowing Power
Another point being overlooked is that negative gearing does not simply affect tax outcomes. It can also directly impact borrowing capacity.
Many lenders currently factor negative gearing benefits into servicing calculations when assessing loan applications.
That means the current system can genuinely help some younger Australians:
- Borrow enough to buy
- Enter the market sooner
- Build equity earlier
- Create long-term financial security
Without those servicing benefits, some buyers may:
- Borrow less
- Delay buying altogether
- Stay renting longer
- Miss opportunities to enter the market
Many Australians would also argue that if private investors are helping provide rental accommodation during a housing shortage, then allowing reasonable tax deductions for the costs involved makes practical sense.
Most Property Investors are Everyday Australians.
There is often a perception that property investors are large-scale wealthy operators. But in reality, most Australians who own an investment property only own one.
According to Australian Taxation Office data, around 70% of property investors own just one investment property.
For many families, that one property is:
- Part of their retirement planning
- A financial safety net
- Something they hope may eventually help their children
- A way to slowly build long-term stability
At the same time, many landlords are already balancing:
- Higher interest rates
- Rising insurance costs
- Land tax
- Maintenance expenses
- Increasing compliance obligations
- Rental arrears risks
Many smaller investors are already questioning whether property investment remains worth the stress and financial risk.
The direct effect will be further Rental shortages and higher rents. How is that helping anyone. Landlords should be incentivised to provide much needed housing not punished? A fairer way could have been restricting these tax incentives to multiple properties but leave the 1st one alone.
Are we punishing The People Providing Rental Housing?
Another concern from our broker team’s perspective is whether these proposed changes risk discouraging the very people currently providing much-needed rental housing.
At a time when Australia is already facing:
- Rental shortages
- Extremely low vacancy rates
- Rising rents
- Strong population growth
…many Australians are questioning whether reducing negative gearing incentives during a housing shortage is the right approach.
For many “mum and dad” investors, property investment is already becoming harder due to:
- Higher interest rates
- Increased land tax
- Rising insurance and maintenance costs
- Growing compliance obligations
- Rental arrears risks
From our perspective, discouraging smaller investors from remaining in the market may unintentionally reduce rental supply even further.
And this raises another important question.
Many renters are not currently in a financial position to purchase property anyway — regardless of investor tax changes.
Some may still struggle to meet lender servicing criteria due to:
- Income limitations
- Existing debts
- Deposit shortfalls
- Credit history concerns
- Casual or unstable employment
- Rising living costs
So if rental supply reduces, rents continue rising, and investors leave the market — what happens to those renters?
That is one of the biggest concerns many Australians working within the housing and finance industry are now asking.
Trust and Policy Certainty Matters
Another issue many Australians are raising is confidence, stability and trust. Property decisions are long-term financial decisions based on:
- Tax settings
- Lending policies
- Retirement planning
- Family goals
- Long-term financial modelling
That is why policy certainty matters.
Many Australians remember multiple repeated public statements by the current government before the election confirming catagorically these types of major property tax changes were not being considered.
Regardless of political views, when governments later revisit major policies, it can create uncertainty for borrowers, investors and families trying to plan ahead.
In already uncertain economic times, stability and trust matter.
And from our broker team’s perspective, uncertainty around taxation, investment and property policy can make Australians more hesitant to invest, build and commit to long-term housing decisions.
Final Thoughts
From our broker team’s perspective, one of the biggest concerns is younger Australians losing the ability to use stepping-stone strategies to enter the market.
For many younger buyers, purchasing a more affordable property further out — either as an investment initially or as a first home that later becomes an investment — has become one of the few realistic pathways toward eventual family home ownership.
We are concerned these proposed changes may make that pathway harder.
At the same time, many Australians should not feel forced into new construction simply because policy settings favour new builds, particularly given ongoing concerns around:
- Red tape and delays
- Builder stability
- Construction quality
- Poor workmanship outcomes seen across the industry in recent years
Ultimately, from our perspective, younger Australians need more realistic pathways into property ownership — not fewer.
As we often say:
“Our job is to show you what’s possible.
Your job is to decide what’s right for you.”
Talk to us
If you would like to review your home loan or explore refinancing options, we’re here to help.
Talk to WhiteStar Finance & Conveyancing to understand your options, improve your finances, and plan your next steps with confidence.